The idea of male ownership over
female bodies is a concept that dates back to the idea of property itself. This
way of thinking separates women as less than human, because when violence
happens against them it is treated as property damage not the violation of the
most basic human right, ownership of one’s own body. The policing of women’s bodies is most
evident in the debate about a women’s right to an abortion but extends its
tentacles to even the way women dress and feel about themselves. We live in a cultural
that profits off the low-self esteem of women, and any divergence from that
norm is seen as arrogant, boastful, or unladylike. All of these ideas came to a
head during the 2016 Election cycle. Hillary Clinton, a women with 30 years of
experience, with unparalleled intelligence, confidence, and leadership skills
was beaten in the electoral college by a thin skinned, internet troll, with a
knack for branding by the name of Donald Trump.
There are
many reasons to not like Hillary Clinton. The one I hear most cited by Trump
voters is, “I don’t trust her” or that she “embodies the establishment that has
failed us.” This in comparison to a man, who is a pathological liar, blatantly
misrepresented facts to manipulate his base, and is the human embodiment of the
capitalist machine that is the true oppressive force keeping down Middle
America. We expect perfection in women in a way we do not with men. To see a
woman speak with confidence and experience makes both men and women
(particularly men) uncomfortable. To quote Marc Maron from one of his recent
WTF podcasts, “And I know a lot of people, a lot of intelligent people, men
specifically, I know, I know, it's hard man. You just want to see that woman
lose. It's hard for a lot of men who are secretly infantile, who feel cheated,
who have issues with their mommies or with their daddies. You know, it's
when you watch a woman with authority, speak with authority, deliver a strong
leadership vibe, a grounded person; for a dude sometimes there's only one way
to take that in and that is, ah, I hate this teacher, ah, she's so mean this
teacher. I wish a substitute was here. Remember that guy? Grow up.” (Source) Hillary Clinton is a deviation from what we
are taught women should be and this can throw some people in to a tizzy of
confusion and anger.
The religious Right Wing in
particular are the most likely to be shocked by a women in a position of
authority since their world view is based on patriarchal values. In My Life on the Road, Gloria Steinem
writes, “If, in monotheism, God is man, man is God. Why does God look
suspiciously like the ruling class? Why is Jesus, a Jewish guy from the Middle
East, blond and blue eyed?” (109).
Steinem brings up the excellent point that forces us to question the
intentions of the leaders of the religious Right Wing. Both men and women on
this side of the aisle have been taught that the current dynamic of power
between men and women, white people and people of color, heterosexual cis
people and all others, is ordained by God and is completely justifiable. When
in reality, people cherry pick parts of the bible to listen to because it will
help maintain these existing structures of power. Women’s reproductive rights
often come at odds with this worldview. The idea that a woman, a giver of life,
should have some say in her family planning instead of God, is one hell of an
idea to some people. In Alienable Rights of Women by Roxanne
Gay, she writes about the obstacles that are put in the way of a woman having
an abortion despite its legality. If
they are even able to access reproductive health centers, women will experience
everything from mandatory multiple sonograms, transvaginal ultrasounds, to
counseling meant to convince her to remain pregnant. In some places doctors
aren’t even required to give medically accurate information. Gay writes, “If
these politicians can’t prevent women from having abortions, they are certainly
going to punish them. They are going to punish these women severely, cruelly,
unusually for daring to make choices about motherhood, their bodies, and their
futures” (271). Reproductive rights are even more extreme for women of color,
where a history of forced sterilization informed the view that reproductive
rights should include more than just the right to an abortion but the right to
have children at all. In Women of Color
and the Reproductive Rights Movement, Jennifer Nelson writes, “Women of
color challenged the white middle-class feminist movement to recognize that the
abortion rights movement needed to encompass “bread and butter” issues such as
health care for the poor, child-care, and welfare rights in addition to
anti-sterilization abuse efforts,” (2). So many conservatives seem so focused
on the “life of an unborn baby” put conveniently forget about the actual real lives
and struggles of single mothers and children because of the misogynistic and
deeply racist stereotype of “welfare queens” as popularized by Ronald Regan.
(Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton during third presidential debate) |
During the third Presidential
debate the subject of abortion came up, Hillary Clinton stated "I have met
with women who toward the end of their pregnancy get the worst news one could
get, that their health is in jeopardy if they continue to carry to term or that
something terrible has happened or just been discovered about the
pregnancy." Seizing the opportunity to electrify pro-life republicans,
Trump stated "With what Hillary is saying, in the ninth month, you can
take the baby and rip the baby out of the womb of the mother just prior to the
birth of the baby. Now, you can say that that's okay, and Hillary can say that
that's okay, but that's not okay with me." Of course, this flat out never
happens but he achieved his goal of manipulating and pandering to the far
right. I think this was a massive reason why Clinton lost the election. My
female latina cousins, whose mother came here illegally from Mexico, voted for
Trump because of this stance. They have been taught by the Catholic Church that
nothing is more evil or selfish than getting an abortion and this made them
overlook the issues that actually affect them.
(Amber Rose owning that sexuality and motherhood are not mutually exclusive) |
On a final note I think this sketch by Amy Schumer is a good
representation of what it means to use the media to question the legislation
that happens around a women’s body.
Gloria Steinem, My Life on the Road
Jennifer Nelson, Women of Color and Reproductive Rights Movement
Roxanne Gay, Alienable Rights of Women
Tanya Stelle, 'Hobby Lobby' and a Woman's Right to Sexual Exploration
No comments:
Post a Comment